Bright lines vs. blurred lines:When do critical audit matters influence investors' perceptions of management's reporting credibility?

Ozlanski, Michael E.,(2019), Bright lines vs. blurred lines:When do critical audit matters influence investors' perceptions of management's reporting credibility? , Advances in Accounting, UNSPECIFIED

[thumbnail of Bright-lines-vs--blurred-lines--When-do-critical-audit-matter_2019_Advances-.pdf] Text - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (529kB)

Abstract

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board will soon require auditors to disclose critical audit matters (CAMs) to highlight areas of financial statements which are subject to a higher risk of material misstatement. Concurrently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board continue their efforts to converge both sets of accounting standards, and the newly converged revenue recognition standard contains a relatively limited amount of implementation guidance. I hypothesize and find that CAMs lower investors' perceptions of management's reporting credibility when the financial statement area discussed by CAMs is governed by precise, but not an imprecise, accounting standards. The emphasis of risks via CAMs is incongruent with investors' expectations about the ability of precise standards to reduce financial reporting risks. The results fromthis experiment with nonprofessional investors provide insights about the interaction between CAMs and accounting standards.
Keywords : Audit reports Management reporting credibility Critical audit matters (CAMs) Accounting standard precision, UNSPECIFIED
Journal or Publication Title: Advances in Accounting
Volume: 45
Number: UNSPECIFIED
Item Type: Article
Subjects: Akuntansi
Depositing User: Users 8 not found.
Date Deposited: 26 Dec 2019 02:03
Last Modified: 26 Dec 2019 02:03
URI: https://repofeb.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/770

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item